No, but they need to explain what went wrong to cause them to think what they did was okay, and why we should believe it won't happen again, at a minimum. If they have no integrity, and hijacking an open source project certainly is sending that message, then I can't imagine what other incentives would stop them from abusing my trust in them for their gain.
I would like something like this, but they need to address this more thoroughly. It's not just a footnote.
>Trust but verify.
What does that actually mean? If I verify, then did I trust?
I don't want to verify, but if they expect us to be doing that work for them they sure as hell need to open source it.
I would like something like this, but they need to address this more thoroughly. It's not just a footnote.
>Trust but verify.
What does that actually mean? If I verify, then did I trust?
I don't want to verify, but if they expect us to be doing that work for them they sure as hell need to open source it.