Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
MiniRHex: a surprisingly capable six-whegged robot (ieee.org)
52 points by Down_n_Out on Dec 14, 2018 | hide | past | favorite | 16 comments


If anyone want to build a hexapod with legs instead of whegs, check out: http://vorpalrobotics.com/wiki/index.php/Vorpal_The_Hexapod

It's 3d printed and the design is fully open, but you can buy a full kit for under $200 if you don't want to buy and print everything yourself.

Disclosure: One of my relatives did a lot of the design.


I like this kit, but the price really jumps when you go "full kit" - but it's still cheaper than just about any other 6-legged robot kit.

That said, one of the nice things about whegs vs. legs is that you get almost all the benefits of legs, with a much simpler (and lower cost - in theory, if you don't go with Robotis servos, etc) design. Basically the whole "80% of the functionality for 20% of the cost" idea...

But the Vorpal is cuter...heh.


The ability to get over obstacles is very impressive. If you have ever watched a RoboMagellan http://robogames.net/rules/magellan.php competition, you will have seen many robots fail to do what MiniRHex can do.

The odometry has to suck, though. The rest of your nav stack had better be able to compensate.

Overall, very performant. It gives me the itch to go out and build one.


Kinda late on this, but I found something similar recently, that was also inspired by the original RHex:

http://robotsquare.com/2013/07/17/zebro-light/

I can't recall where or how I found it (there's a good chance it was mentioned here on HN)...


I feel like there should be a [sic] after 'whegged', because I assumed it was a careless typo.


Googling for that word gives quite a few hits. whegged = wheeled leg.


wheg = wheeled leg

whegged = wheeled legged


Naming the bot Whex might help in understanding. As in "Whex the 6-whegged rhowbot."


I think that would anti-help. Usually sic means something is a typo, just not yours.


It is also used for things that actually are spelled correctly, as here, but might be otherwise confused for a typo.


Do you have a reference for this use? I have never heard of it.


This is from my Oxford concise English dictionary, 9ed (1995):

> sic usage: the word sic is placed in brackets after a word that appears odd or erroneous to show that the word is quoted exactly as it stands in the original

There's also this part of the entry in Wikipedia [1]

> A sic may show that an uncommon or archaic expression is reported faithfully

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic#To_denote_archaisms_and_di...


I still feel like it comes with the implication that you're not expected to see this as a normal term; but in this case, its apparently perfectly well-known, just in a particular field that HN doesn't perhaps specialize in.

It would be like adding [sic] to articles about quantum mechanics, using terms that a physicist naturally know, but a programmer wouldn't. And that'd just be weird (or rather, a lot of [sic]'s going around)


The Wiki article is helpful[1], I think of it as a shorthand for "that's what they said, whether or not it's correct/comprehensible".

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic


So it begins


I, for one, welcome...

But, seriously, I think just aesthetically, these whegged robots are a lot less creepy than robots with articulated legs; a lot less robot like.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: