> Right, because when shadowy groups get unimaginable leverage and power the first thing they do is apply affirmative action pressure to address gender imbalances.
State Street also used that as a marketing stunt to launch an ETF while they were being sued for sexual harassment and pay discrepancies between male and female employees. Marketing is marketing is marketing.
Nothing exists in a vacuum just like solely attributing companies adding female directors to a marketing stunt. There was large momentum on this front already that would have happened with or without this.
I never meant to imply positive things couldn’t happen, just that it’s silly to assume one very specific positive thing is the most likely thing to happen.
Yes, that is exactly what happened, dasil003
https://newsroom.statestreet.com/press-release/corporate/sta...
State Street has 2.7 Trillion AUM