> While your approach is: "Here is my resume, now I demand you to give me examples so I can prove my point."
I already probed my point beyond what I said afterwards. You just need existing cryptography and don't need a blockchain to make secure agreements between parties.
> Ah great! Since your argument is that they can all be replaced, can you name a private blockchain solution that IS running in production that can be replaced?
I don't need to since I am arguing about the no sense of private blockchains.
> IANAL but AFAIK this is completely false. Do you have any examples of smart contracts running on blockchains being enforced in a court?
If the smart contract uses digital signatures they are enforced by the existing law.
Also, as you probably know, this field is very new and the law was not, in general, involved with this kind of technologies.
I already probed my point beyond what I said afterwards. You just need existing cryptography and don't need a blockchain to make secure agreements between parties.
> Ah great! Since your argument is that they can all be replaced, can you name a private blockchain solution that IS running in production that can be replaced?
I don't need to since I am arguing about the no sense of private blockchains.
> IANAL but AFAIK this is completely false. Do you have any examples of smart contracts running on blockchains being enforced in a court?
If the smart contract uses digital signatures they are enforced by the existing law.
Also, as you probably know, this field is very new and the law was not, in general, involved with this kind of technologies.