Try creating something non-trivial and you will see how little you know about the subject.
DARPA looks at what is plausible and spends money to get the brainpower (a number in the hundreds or less) who can create the tools and create the process thinking about things that the military wants or needs.
If you’ve spent years doing this stuff and training a classifier is an insurmountable obstacle, you should consider changing your field of work.
I imagine another line will be "it's marginally better than statistical human shooting, according to three studies!"
And then in the 'big house' people will refer to you as "Butterstats" or something. Because you were screaming "marginally better" the first night they left you in your cell.
Yo, butter stats, how's your appeal going?