Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't know, this sounds a little bit like that sovereign citizen "wrong flag in the courtroom" stuff.

Even if they haven't replied, the original contract is still sitting there clearly stating that a certain set of assumptions are in place if you use the software. I don't see any way to argue that a non-reply implies consent to new terms or abandonment of any terms.




A contract is only valid if both parties agree. If one of them explicitly disagrees, the contract is definitely not valid.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: