Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Pretty irresponsible to completely brick production servers when doing an upgrade.

https://status.kraken.com

Sounds like their staff has being going without sleep for a few days now.




> Sounds like their staff has being going without sleep for a few days now.

Given that sleep deprivation has effects similar to being blackout drunk, I'd consider that equally irresponsible[0].

[0]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1739867/


I've lost count the number of times "watched the sunrise" was the climax of an IT war story. Bonus points for two nights in a row ! :D


Worked for a IT managed services place that made staff pull 24+ hrs non stop regularly. I walked away from that career and spent years recovering from a 38 hr shift where I was begging my managers to get me relief. "Your the only guy that knows this well enough" is a sign you work for a failing organization pinning that shit on you. I learned that the "business" and sales dudes absolutely will trade your health/lively hood for a few extra bucks on commission.


I can't help but feel less stressed about my own job after reading this status page.


It's not an upgrade, it's a bugfix. Probably an important bug, they don't want to risk tens/hundreds of millions of dollars.


They could have left the legacy system running before switching irreversibly to the new bugged system. That way they can rollback the change.


Unless the bug being fixed was some sort of critical security failure that enabled people to game the exchange or manipulate balances. I am guessing this is more of a screw-up by amateurs than a 'take it all down until this hole is patched' situation, but there is a slim possibility that keeping it up was a bigger risk than the reputation hit of extended downtime.


Looks like these are announced improvements to the Exchange engine. Really look forward to a post-mortem on this issue. Curious if they had issues with database migrations or such, that required recovery from backup in case of errors. Plus, for sure there were bugs in the code itself.


No, they couldn't. It's a large trading platform. Any serious bug can lead to the theft of tens of millions of dollars worth of cryptocurrencies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: