Colo(u)r me impressed.
I'm getting 0.1 versus 125 for WebAsm versus ASM.js/JS of ~210 – kind of crazy that Chrome can run plain JS as fast as ASM.js (or is it?)
Firefox (57) can't run Shader unless there's some under the hood option I have to turn on …
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/QA/Graphics...
The graphics section in about:support might tell you your WebGL status.
Colo(u)r me impressed.
I'm getting 0.1 versus 125 for WebAsm versus ASM.js/JS of ~210 – kind of crazy that Chrome can run plain JS as fast as ASM.js (or is it?)
Firefox (57) can't run Shader unless there's some under the hood option I have to turn on …