Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Scott Aaronson does not explicitly say the proof is wrong, but says

> If P≠NP has indeed been proved, my life will change so dramatically that having to pay $200,000 will be the least of it. […] If P≠NP is proved, then to whatever extent theoretical computer science continues to exist at all, it will have a very different character.


> I can afford $200k, but not in the same way Bill Gates can afford $200k.

Discussed here:


As randomwalker says, it's not entirely obvious that Aaronson is betting against the proof.

It is.

It wasn't, when the comment you just downmodded was written. There's a reason Aaronson's posted multiple clarifications, after all...

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact