Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

This is not the point.



Sure it is. Scribd has succeeded in going from "the worst pdf viewer on the web" to something that's perfectly usable using HTML5.

-----


Perfectly usable compared to what?

A big toolbar at the top, a big toolbar at the bottom, a big sidebar, none of which have any information I want to see; ads all over, and I have to sign up for their website to download the PDF.

That's not even as good as Acrobat (last I used it), never mind a lightweight PDF reader, never mind Chrome's integrated PDF rendering.

-----


2 things.

- The html5 transformation is not instant. Everyone gets the Flash reader till the HTML5 version gets ready. Which can be anywhere between minutes to hours (I don't know the avg time).

- The HTML5 version or the Flash is worse than a plain old PDF viewer. Have you used the Integrated PDF viewer in Chrome lately? PDF under chrome makes reading PDF fun again, its the fastest/smoothest PDF viewer I have ever used

Also in order for me to download the PDF version I have to either register or sign in with my facebook account? What nonsense is that?

-----


Have you used BugMeNot?

http://www.bugmenot.com/view/scribd.com

-----


I have in the past for other sites. But now, sites that do decide to BugMe I choose Not to visit them.*

*NYT being the exception.

-----


The best PDF viewer on the web is still not as nice as Preview.app. Just because hairs can be split doesn't mean we want that distraction.

-----




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: