Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Unfair comparison. Bitcoin benefits all who hold it, not a single corporation.

If anything, my "GDP" comparison was off the mark because GDP typically represents a country's total wealth, and bitcoin can't have a GDP. But it's a useful abstraction that comes pretty close.

Those bitcoin paper millionaires are investing in startups like Pinkapp, and Pinkapp is hiring programmers. All of this is happening outside the legal system. What does that say to you about bitcoin's ability to affect the world?




> Unfair comparison. Bitcoin benefits all who hold it, not a single corporation.

No, that's not how economies work. "Bitcoin benefits all who hold it" is like saying "the USD benefits everyone who has a USD". It's a completely meaningless statement.

> But it's a useful abstraction that comes pretty close.

No, it doesn't come close at all. Bitcoin's market cap has absolutely nothing to do with the value that Bitcoin adds to society, and thus it is a completely meaningless metric to look at if you are trying to decide if it "merits" use of our resources.

>Those bitcoin paper millionaires are investing in startups like Pinkapp, and Pinkapp is hiring programmers. All of this is happening outside the legal system. What does that say to you about bitcoin's ability to affect the world?

Nothing? I don't know what you're trying to say with this. Just because people made money off of bitcoin and now can use that money to hire other people does not mean it is affecting the world any more than anything else that people make money off of.

I also have no idea what you mean when you say "All of this is happening outside the legal system." That is another completely meaningless statement. I assure you that investments in startups and hiring of programmers all happens firmly within the bounds of all applicable legal systems. But even if it wasn't, it still says nothing about bitcoin's "ability to affect the world".

You need to stop drinking the bitcoin koolaid, bro. You're spouting nonsense in an attempt to defend it.


Just because people made money off of bitcoin and now can use that money to hire other people does not mean it is affecting the world

This doesn't follow.

I also have no idea what you mean when you say "All of this is happening outside the legal system." That is another completely meaningless statement. I assure you that investments in startups and hiring of programmers all happens firmly within the bounds of all applicable legal systems.

You haven't done even the most cursory search for Pinkapp. It's outside of the legal system, i.e. criminal.

You need to stop drinking the bitcoin koolaid, bro. You're spouting nonsense in an attempt to defend it.

Please re-read the site guidelines:

https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

It's important on HN to comment civilly and substantively or not at all.


OK, let's do it the other way. Let's pretend (in BTC's favour) that market cap and GDP are the same thing.

World GDP is around 100 trillion.

So by your own figures, if it were denominated in BTC or equivalent cryptocurrency, we'd require more than 100% of the world's current power output just to store and send people's money.

That's more power output than is currently required for all the world's homes, factories, hospitals, transportation networks and all the world's computing power, everything. Which also benefits everyone who uses it, and creates jobs for a few billion people

Do you now see why people don't think current crypto tech is a particularly optimal use of power?


This is a strawman argument. I'm trying to think of a charitable interpretation, but it's difficult.

The world's currency isn't ever going to be 100% bitcoin. It's an invalid basis to start from.

I kind of see what you're trying to hint at, but it would be helpful for discussion if you could think of a more persuasive example.

(It may be difficult though, because it seems true to say that if Bitcoin starts becoming a significant fraction of the world's GDP then it's fine if it uses a little power. Where "little" is relative to the ratio of BTC's wealth vs the world's wealth, vs BTC's power usage to the world's power usage.)


> Where "little" is relative to the ratio of BTC's wealth vs the world's wealth, vs BTC's power usage to the world's power usage.

If that's your metric then bitcoin gets an F- right now. Its world power usage fraction is much much higher than its world wealth fraction.


GDP is more akin to a Country's income rather than wealth (for simplicity: the sum of all salaries and corporate profits generated by the country's residents, either physical or legal entities; imports and exports of goods and services have an impact too but let's ignore it for the sake of simplicity). So the similitude with Bitcoin would be with the added coins in one year. Just for some reference. In 2016 Italy had a GDP of 1.8 Trillion USD, 2.5% of Global GDP, close to the 2T of comments here ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nomi... ). In 2012 it had share of 1.5% (321 / 20,900 PWh) of total electricity power ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_energy_consumption , let's assume that share has not changed much since 2012). Global GDP growth is around 3.5% in 2016-17 (a bit more than 1.5 Italies get added to the Global economy).

Broadly speaking, Central banks today feed this growth by printing money (i.e. increasing the money supply), hence inflation. A deflationary currency like bitcoin would have to grow in unit value accordingly because of its cap, if it were to become the de-facto new gold standard. How much power consumption is appropriate for mining needs to be considered in relative terms vs how much mower hungry is gold mining, for example. I am not sure how power hungry is printing and managing cash (incl. security, transport...). Also, all these activities (gold mining, bitcoin mining, cash printing) also contribute to GDP. Eventually if the power source is renewable and generation capacity is kept at appropriate level (e.g no one dies of cold because power must be prioritized to mining) does it matter? Or am i missing something?


Oh man, the legal system is gonna surprise anyone who thinks they are operating outside of it. And not in a good way.



Sure. But also look up all the dark markets the FBI busted.


The interesting thing is, this founder has apparently put in contingency plans in case they mess up. The organization can continue.

I'm not sure how true that will turn out to be, but it's an interesting attempt.


Many groups of criminals have had contingency plans. Some worked out, some not.


Your argument that bitcoin is worth wasting a large fraction of the worlds energy is that it lets you get a hooker easier?





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: