> That looks neat. Is there a downside to using a non-mainstream distribution?
The useless, information-free response to a lot of end user requests for help on Linux tends to be "try a different distribution." If that happens 20% of the time to users of a popular distribution who ask a question online - that figure is just a guess - I can only imagine how often it will happen to users of an obscure distro.
> Is there a downside to using a non-mainstream distribution?
There are three things I can think of immediately that would make me skeptical about using a new distro vs one of the more established ones:
1) I would be worried about the maintainers supporting it with timely updates (especially around security)
2) I would be interested in how it is configured out of the box, from a security perspective and if it's a derivative of one of the mainstream distros then what changes are they making?
3) I would be interested in how they plan to work with upstream communities (i.e. that they do NOT follow the Canonical/Ubuntu model).
