Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

OK, thanks. That makes sense to me.

I'm pretty much in the Hawking/Dawkins camp regarding religion, I must admit.

Edit: Quoting Hawking, from the Wikipedia article on the conflict thesis: "There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works." That was obvious to me when I was 12.




> There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason

Except if you look at actual history of science and religion, it's way far from being that simple. Religions change, sometimes drastically, and are completely capable of overthrowing and even completely abolishing (see move from Catholicism to Protestantism) the authority structure. And science has plenty of authority issues, to the point where researches note that in some areas significant progress is made only when "old school" dies out and is replaced by "new school" - not because of reason, but because of physical limits of human existence. And some areas of science are very much influenced by political and other issues that have little to do with observation and reason.

So in practice both work in ways much more complicated than that.


I'm no fan of religion myself. Including fundamentalist atheism.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: