Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> I wonder why she didn't write [two] versions.

Because the reviewers took over 10 months to respond with a rejection mainly citing the length of the paper. And more importantly, "By that point, everyone who might have wanted to read it had almost certainly found it here and done so, so I saw little merit in drastically shortening the paper."[1]

She has updated the blog post which discusses all the nuanced details of the whole affair last month (2017-07-25)[2].

[1] http://www.pcg-random.org/paper.html [2] http://www.pcg-random.org/posts/history-of-the-pcg-paper.htm...




There is no excuse for the journal to take so long to provide a response. At the same time, it seems to me that their response was entirely predictable. Or does the journal usually post such long articles directed at a general audience?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: