Please try doing that to every internet troll out there, if you have the time.
Most of the population don't, and at some point just have to dismiss some ridiculous arguments instead of discussing every single badly researched wall of text.
I suggest you start with all the articles on /r/the_donald.
Like many online echo chambers, /r/the_donald bans people who dissent in any way. It is not a place where it is possible to engage in discussion. In fact, reddit is a horrible place to engage in meaningful discussion, as users can downvote any opinion they disagree with and make it disappear, and mods can ban any users they disagree with. It's easy to label people as trolls, but I have been banned from multiple subreddits when attempting to participate in discussions in good faith.
> In fact, reddit is a horrible place to engage in meaningful discussion, as users can downvote any opinion they disagree with and make it disappear, and mods can ban any users they disagree with.
That's a funny response to a comment that was so heavily downvoted it's completely hidden for users unless they specifically change their HN settings.
Yea, downvote buttons are a massive detriment to discussion on social media. The comment isn't hidden for me, and it wasn't light grey when I replied. HN is a little better in that they are more sparsely used, but it can still be abused. Same with mass reports on Facebook, same with downvotes on Youtube. That button makes bubbles.
Most of the population don't, and at some point just have to dismiss some ridiculous arguments instead of discussing every single badly researched wall of text.
I suggest you start with all the articles on /r/the_donald.