Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Your argument also applies to the global warming 'settled science'.

My argument is pro-science and against technology that misapplies or hastily applies science for profit.

So in fact it's in the "global warming is real" side of the debate.

Except if you mean someone could make the same argument I speak against, and say "global warming doesn't exist, because science is wonderful and would never hurt us" or "global warming doesn't matter because science will save us". Then yes, those people would be confusing science with technology again.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact