On: Connect: behind the front-end experience

[kakarot]

I'm not making that leap at all. I specifically classified turing completeness and being considered a programming separately. Read my post again.

A programming language doesn't need to be turing complete. But CSS is neither of the two.

[allover → kakarot]

I read your post. You clearly brought in turing completeness to try and support your argument. Your other points I've addressed, think we're done here.

[kakarot → allover]

I can't help it if you misinterpret my words.

But I very clearly did not conflate turing completeness as a requirement of a programming language. I just thought it was worth mentioning that CSS3 + HTML5 is Turing complete.

And you are still completely incorrect about CSS being a programming language. I think we are done here.

[allover → kakarot]

> And you are still completely incorrect about CSS being a programming language.

Nope.

[kakarot → allover]

[citation needed]

[allover → kakarot]

wikipedia.com

[kakarot → allover]

I like that you couldn't link it, because it says nowhere on the page that CSS is a programming language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets

[allover → kakarot]

You misunderstood my (granted) flippant point which was meant to mean 'lookup "programming language" on wikipedia', not 'go to the CSS page and look for it to explicitly call it a programming language'.

The whole point is, nothing about CSS being a stylesheet or presentational language makes it fall outside of the definition of programming language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language