Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Impressive work. One note: use of MMX instructions in 2017 is odd, as MMX is dead.



It's available everywhere now - superceded, yes, but this book is probably older than it looks. That page links to HAKMEM (1972)!

From a scan of the TOC it looks like a great introduction to C programming from a machine point of view. Although, as DJB has pointed out, there can be a big gap between "what all sane compilers do on this architecture" vs "what the C standard actually guarantees".

Edit: thinking about this, it's a bit Intel-centric. The people more likely to be writing low-level code these days would be targeting ARM or even AVR/PIC.


> this book is probably older than it looks

Yes, from the copyright notice it looks like it was originally started in 2008. Though HAKMEM was already ancient in 2008, too.

> From a scan of the TOC it looks like a great introduction to C programming from a machine point of view.

Maybe, but from the actual contents it's hard to tell what it's trying to do. The C part starts out with a section on C types, with the first sentence being "This section doesn’t attempt to be a primer on C types; instead, I cover aspects I consider to be of importance for low-level programming."

So it's not a primer on C, fair enough. But then it goes on to explain the const and extern keywords, and how to declare structs. It's hard to tell what audience this is aimed at. People who already know enough C not to need an actual primer on C, but who do still need an explanation of const and a very partial explanation of structs?

Other parts, like the malloc implementation at the end, look better, though.


hey there & thanks for the feedback! :)

as it was called nicely, you should consider this book a set of musings and notes. one of the driving ideas behind the c part was to introduce the readers to things new in c99. :P

that malloc, whereas kinda okay, has already been rewritten and the new version is under construction. it sports thread-local magazine caches and all kinds of hacks i've found interesting to mess around with. :)

cheers,

vendu


hehe vendu has been taken already (possibly by me, might have forgotten about it)... =)

back when i wrote this book, i didn't have sse beyond sse1 on my desktop box, so i used mmx. the point was to demonstrate some basic use of simd.

cheers & thanks,

vendu =)


Dead or under utilized


dead


MMX is not really dead - how else would you do byte level integer processing? AFAIK the later SIMD instructions are all float based


Not true, SSE2 added support for performing all the MMX operations, but at 128-bit width in the SSE registers. AVX2 expanded that out to 256-bit width later.


Right--there is no reason to use MMX today, and two good reasons not to. SSE2 and follow-on extensions give better performance, and the SSE registers do not alias the x87 stack, which removes the risk of a particularly nasty and difficult to diagnose class of bug (failure to issue EMMS following MMX usage can cause x87 stack corruption billions of cycles later in an apparently unrelated call tree).


hey!

as i told you guys above, i didn't have sse2+ around at the time i wrote those chapters.

thanks a million for the note on x87 stack corruption, i didn't know about that bug. ;)

hack on,

vendu


SSE2 introduced integer instructions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: