Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

I meant breaking in that the Java 10 compiler would be targeting a newer version of the JVM and could dispense with having to be backwards compatible, which was one of the reasons I remember reading for generics.



Where are you reading that? The Java N compiler always targets version N of the JVM (well, by default, anyway), and you can't run bytecode on older versions of the JVM.

I would sincerely doubt they're considering breaking back-compat in Java 10 (that is, making it so older bytecode targeting something <10 cannot run on 10+).




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: