Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

NIST made clear that by the time of finalist selection, the point of SHA-3 was NOT to replace SHA-2. OP should know better.

That's exactly what this post is about. That we shouldn't replace SHA-2 with SHA-3, just what NIST ordered :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: