I recently started learning Chinese, and my grammar is still very basic. Simply replacing all the vocabulary (like a substitution cipher) using my app at http://pingtype.github.io helps me to learn new words.
Rearranging sentences for the parts of speech (noun/verb/subject/object) is comparable to the ROTR and ROTL described in the linked article.
How can I make more parallels between the cryptographic domain and the human language domain to make my studies easier?
The oddest result I got was a rendering of 我长得不漂亮 as wǒ zhǎng dé bù piào liang "I long obtain no pretty". This gets the pronunciation right on four out of six characters. It gets the meaning right on three out of five words. Weirdly, it gets the pronunciation of 长 zhǎng "grow" right while glossing it as if it were 长 cháng "long".
If I give it 重新 chóngxīn, which is an adverb meaning something like "start over", it recognizes it as a single word of the correct pronunciation, but mysteriously glosses it as "reappear".
If I give it 我的狗去世了, it does pretty well, but glosses 了, a modality marker, as "is", which makes me extremely uneasy.
I actually agree that word-by-word glossing like that is helpful, but this tool is doing a questionable job. Words that are more syntactic than semantic will be nearly impossible to fit into a word-by-word-gloss system -- for example, the ABC dictionary's gloss of "result 得" from the sentence above is "subordinating particle used to link a verb [or adjective] and the manner clause that follows it". This is difficult to condense into something that it would make sense for your app to render.
In the sentence 我的狗去世了 "my dog has died", 了 is the change-of-state particle, appropriate because my dog (presumably) used to be alive, but it's dead now. It's definitely not a verb; the verb is, depending on your perspective, 去世 "die" or just 去 "go".
If you're interested in my advice, I think the highest-value thing you can do to get good glosses is get Pleco for your smartphone and purchase the ABC Dictionary and Tuttle Learner's Dictionary addons. It'll be less convenient than your app, but much higher quality. (Detection of word boundaries is imperfect; google translate may actually be better at that particular task.)
> If you know of any other good ones (including a sample break), then please provide the link
Two months after that article was published:
> But I listened carefully, because I suspected an easy target that I wanted to have a go at.
This was my easy target.
I find it quite fascinating how people who produce snake-oil crypto tend to not accept any mention of possible faults in their algorithms, in comparison to professional cryptographers who welcome public cryptanalysis.