Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

From what I've heard of lawyers in the Free Software world, they most applauf AGPLv3 for its clarity and precision.

Maybe it just seems imprecise to a layperson because they don't know the well-defined meaning of various legal terms? (... and confuse these with their fuzzy meaning in ordinary language)




> From what I've heard of lawyers in the Free Software world, they most applauf AGPLv3 for its clarity and precision.

You're sure they were talking AGPLv3 and not [L]GPLv3?

The definitions of what constitutes an interactive program is quite vague (sect 0 and 13). Let's say you have a database server under AGPL (mongo, or say citus). Clearly they support interactive access in some form, but from the perspective of user of an application using said database access is not interactive, nor is it clear how the database could provide such an interactive notice. Various vendors addressed that issue with clarifying notes about their understanding, but that definitely increases doubts of possible users, including their lawyers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: