Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm pretty sure I tell my stories chronologically forwards. What a strange accusation.

(This is one of those things that's going to bug me for a while every time I tell a story.)




The assertion in the OP is that forward stories are practiced beforehand and are thereby less likely to be true. I am introspective in nature, so I do have many (true) stories thought over again and again.

I would rather disagree to the idea of telling stories backwards. We aren't doing Memento things after all! :-) It's best to tell the (true) story the true way, the way it happened.


I'm not sure the "backwards" suggestion was meant to be taken quite so literally, my interpretation is that interrogative conversation, as opposed to narration, is the goal. Conversations, as opposed to narratives, do frequently go backwards without us even knowing about it or thinking about it, it probably happens more than you think.

"Hey I wrote this code"

"Why did you do that?"

"Because the frobnobbitz wasn't accounting for tribbles."

That's a conversation that runs backward. Anytime someone asked you 'why', and you answer, it's backwards. You don't have any control over what direction it is because the person asked you a question.

I'm really not sure but I suspect my own stories are less likely to paint an accurate picture of something than an interrogative conversation is. All humans have cognitive biases, so I wouldn't rule it out by thinking that I'm trying to tell the truth.

I've watched people practice true stories, many times, to a point that they become misleading. Not untrue, just misleading. (NB the author said "not entirely true".) Events are left out, motivations are made to look better intentioned than they were, etc. etc..

To be fair, I've seen plenty of lies made up on the spot too, so I'll refrain from defending the claim that one is more likely to be true than the other.

I still see value in placing conversation over narrative in a job interview.


Yeah, same here. Sometimes I might give away a bit of the punchline by asking if I've told them about X, before launching into the story. But generally, it's left for last, like all good stories. Otherwise, it's the definition of anti-climactic.

When giving information to someone, sure, lead with the important stuff. But when telling a tale? Pff, no.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: