Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

It's a nice effort, but I'm disheartened at the lack of labeling for sourcing, as if the source (nevermind the methodology of collection) is subordinate or ancillary to the data itself. There is a massive difference between stats (and taxonomy) collected by local jurisdictions and, say, by the FBI. I know it's a beta, but it's not as if source labels are some optional feature when it comes to the integrity of data.

edit: Exhibit A: Firearms licenses

http://imgur.com/a/IggVx

Where did this data come from? What kind of firearms? What kind of licenses? This data is absolutely useless without context.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: