[NateLawson]

Better, add AES and SHA-256 support to NaCl. With your insight into preventing side channel attacks, it would be a great combo.

[gduffy → NateLawson]

I could be wrong, but I don't think NaCl is portable anywhere but x86 or x86_64. ARM needs good crypto too. Though I suppose we could ask for ARM support in NaCl too since we're asking for ponies :)

Also, does NaCl support signing? I think crypto_box offers "authentication" which is a slightly different promise.

[NateLawson → gduffy]

No signatures yet. See this summary I wrote a while back for more info.

http://rdist.root.org/2009/07/14/nacl-djbs-new-crypto-librar...