Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Actually the radius is 5mm in the paper, it was nneonneo that got that part wrong.

The wrong part doesn't come from the 5mm, it comes from being orders of magnitude wrong by some other method.

Oh, yeah I know. Didn't mean to imply your main point was incorrect.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact