Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Cloudflare redacted the name of the Agent, but left their signature. That's a very literal (and maybe risky?) reading of their obligations.

The letter states explicitly that it is requested, but not required, that they redact the name and phone number of the agent.

I thought the same, but was it intentional or rather just oversight?

Risky or not, I make a very "in-your-face" reading of Cloudflare's attitude. This little detail speaks loudest in the whole story, I think.

And what is the benefit of being 'in your face'?

I didn't mean to imply any benefit.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact