Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

This is awesome - thank you! I went through a similar exercise described in your link in evaluating the utility of the tool I described above. This is a nice write up of the logic.

In my case the % occurrence of the defect was very high and the False-Positive cost is also very high so my tool could provide value without being too stellar of a model.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact