Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A very good analysis of these very questions is Manufacturing Consent by Chomsky and Herman.[1] It is fairly scientific, supported by case studies of mainstream coverage of roughly similar atrocities committed by U.S. allies or the U.S. itself, and official U.S. enemies.

In fact it reviews the very case of East Timor. It compares the near total silence of coverage of that (Indonesia's brutal dictator was an ally) to the coverage of the Communist Khmer Rouge atrocities in Cambodia, which was extensive and impassioned.

They discuss a few simple mechanisms that help explain how this bias happens in our otherwise democratic society, which they call the Propaganda Model.[2] A key factor is that major media is funded by advertising, which imparts a kind of natural selection for viewpoints that favor the class interests of the business elite (which extends to foreign policy that favors a powerful American state). So by the time you get hired as a reporter for major media, you've already been selected. You don't have to be told to do the right thing, because you already believe what you're doing to be right.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Manufacturing-Consent-Political-Econo...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_model




Does the Council on Foreign Relations play a role in "selecting" the journalists?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: