Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Insertion into an array list at a uniformly-distributed location is always O(n): you can't avoid moving half the list. Appending is amortized O(1).



Not the person you're responding to but perhaps that person meant assuming your insertions are uniformly distributed? Then I think insertion is O(n) amortized..?

At an insertion you'd have

(n + (n-1) + .. + 1)/n = O(n^2) / n = O(n)

The first part comes from each possible run times, each with probability 1/n. You might have to expand the list but that'd also be O(n) amortized.


You are right, my bad. I meant appending.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: