Hacker News new | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Just to play devils advocate, won't there be a self correcting mechanism?

If results are genuinely useful, then people will want to build upon that work, and will have to repeat the science. On the other hand if it can't be repeated, then it will not get further work done and fade into obscurity. Curious what other peoples opinion on this are?

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact