1. How should we receive costly research that took special equipment and lots of time to develop and cultivate? I.e., CERN?
2. A lot of research is published, ignored, and then rediscovered. In this case, we may want to accept the research until it cannot be repeated (i.e., in another journal publication).
3. Reviewers of academic publications probably are not qualified or have the time to recreate all scientific research.
4. Isn't the academic system at its core kinda... broken?
can your elaborate on what you mean?