Maybe because there are no evidence that it's effective.
That guy spent years being a chiropractor and while he acknowledges that the postulates of vertebral subluxation theory is implausible, he was also able to spend years helping people with spinal manipulations working as a chiropractor. It was only until recently that physical therapists began doing adjustments which began competing with chiropractics
Like with anything, there are good and bad actors and even a bad actor may help people even if their justification for why something is helping is fundamentally flawed.
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Did he help them or did he deliver placebos? "Most cases of back pain are self limiting, and spinal manipulation is not often more effective than other physical treatment modalities in affecting the final outcome."
> Like with anything, there are good and bad actors and even a bad actor may help people even if their justification for why something is helping is fundamentally flawed.
Is there actual science supporting the claims? Not the mechanism claims, which are clearly bullshit. Is there even any support in the science for the claims of effectiveness?
You want a study on effectiveness in treating asthma or deafness, then it's probably not available.
Effectiveness in treating something like scoliiosis? Yep, there is a study for that. How about headaches? Seems to be some positive research on it.
Now I'm no scientist or statistician and there are also studies point to non-effectiveness in things like lower back-pain, yet even that study acknowledges that it's difficult to ascertain since most chiropractic packages aren't limited to simply adjustments.
I find it interesting how many people denounce sweeping generalizations when it comes to programming paradigms and approaches to infrastructure and application development... yet still fall victim to it when it's a topic outside their domain.
We're still just talking about problem solving here, so how come it's not a matter of defining the problem and assessing each approach in context of that problem?
This thread here: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/4ug8vw/this_chiropr...
You can see a clear divide. It's far from the homeopathy agreement that it's bullshit. It also seems like most people arguing against chiropractors have never experienced even a good massage and its benefits.
Many people had good experience with horoscope or homeopathy and so on... I think any reasonable discussion shouldn't be based on personal anecdotes but on serious scientific protocols.
> It's far from the homeopathy agreement that it's bullshit. It also seems like most people arguing against chiropractors have never experienced even a good massage and its benefits.
I'm certainly not saying that all manual therapies are bullshit. Chiropractic doesn't equate to manual therapy.
Without Chiropractors and PT's who incorporate it into their practice there'd be a lot more people on opiates.
I cannot get over this kind of unhelpful bullshit.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".