>> Web devs should make sites that work without javascript, so that turning on NoScript is also a solution.
> Sorry but this is a ridiculous statement, it's like saying websites should still be able to run on Gopher.
Sorry, but your statement is ridiculous. Unless the website is an
application, that is, it does something useful, it's just bunch of text
and images. You should not expect people to give you full Turing capability
just because you're too full of your awesomeness that you can write a program.
> Sorry but this is a ridiculous statement, it's like saying websites should still be able to run on Gopher.
Sorry, but your statement is ridiculous. Unless the website is an application, that is, it does something useful, it's just bunch of text and images. You should not expect people to give you full Turing capability just because you're too full of your awesomeness that you can write a program.