Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Next step: steganography



Steganography needs vast quantities of cover data. You're increasing the bandwidth costs dramatically when you recommend steganography for everything.


Steganography needs vast quantities of cover data.

Porn? Perhaps the world's smut peddlers will become beacons of freedom and civil disobedience? (Sounds like a Neal Stephenson book.)


That's a terrible TX/RX ratio. Unless you encode data in each request and receive small pictures only, it would take ages to send any real information. Good for receiving though.


Every huge porn site is banned in Kazakhstan. I believe that porn is forbidden here.

The worst thing — they just ban sites without any explanation. Site just stopped to work and you don't know why. Even w3.org was banned for some time (probably because its validator could be used as web proxy).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: