Hacker News new | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Note the ex officio statement in the IP chapter: even if a copyright holder does not want to initiate border measures (e.g. destroy fanzines), this can be enforced by governments, http://www.mfat.govt.nz/downloads/trade-agreement/transpacif.... In 2013, Japanese lawyers warned about the fair use implications, http://japanitlaw.blogspot.com/2013/01/tpps-effect-on-fanzin... & http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Course_Pages/IP_Theor...

  Article 18.76: Special Requirements related to Border Measures 

  5. Each Party shall provide that its competent authorities 
  may initiate border measures ex officio [118] with respect 
  to goods under customs control that are:  

    (a) imported; (b) destined for export; (c) in transit,

  and that are suspected of being counterfeit trademark 
  goods or pirated copyright goods. 

  [118]  For greater certainty, ex officio action does 
         not require a formal complaint from a third party 
         or right holder.



> For greater certainty of abuse

FTFY

And are there any accountability or requirements for being familiar with the thing it is claimed to infringe? Should everything have to carry copyright notice signed by all copyright holders?


    For greater certainty, ex officio action does
    not require a formal complaint from a third party
    or right holder
I wonder if it's possible for a "third party or right holder" to explicitly state that they don't wish to start border measures.


They could just grant the fan site a license. Or had a broad license that fan materials can use.

It isn't unheard of.


The text quoted in the original comment says "suspected of", though. So that may not help.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: