That article is hardly informative. What did he do wrong? Sentence juveniles solely to a single contracted prison? So were his decisions actually compromised? Or was it just the kickbacks that are at issue.
There's a sad state of affairs on the internet, where a couple of paragraphs of slanted commentary are called an 'article'.
Given that thousands of juvenile detentions were overturned, it was shown that he interfered with things beyond a reasonable doubt (though I agree that this isn't the best article).
For one of the more egregious examples (though there were several things wrong with this - this was just the last link in the chain) was the extended detention of a child whose 'crime' was insulting his school principal on Myspace.
There's a sad state of affairs on the internet, where a couple of paragraphs of slanted commentary are called an 'article'.